I picked up a 50ct. box of one hundred sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn off the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is 50 bullets. But I really want to locate a bullet during the 160 class that my more mature rifle likes.
I might say you'd be superior off seeing if another person could be prepared to trade you some Varget to your H4831SC.
It is very likely that no more discussion is necessary, during which case we endorse starting off a completely new thread. If having said that you are feeling your response is needed you are able to continue to do so.
Run your load up with the particular powder (sc or regular) and whole lot you're applying even though. Exact melt away charge does not imply it'll behave "particularly" the identical. I have found around 100 fps difference between sc and mil-surp many H4831.
The only real big difference as I are aware of it is that the SC was made to function via powder measures better (which it does). The for a longer period grains never feed effectively in any respect in some steps. Thats my 02 :grin:
Liberalism; The unattainable but approved Idea that it's solely possible to pick up a turd from the thoroughly clean conclude.
I'm working with it that has a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as precise. RL22 did properly but I used to be somewhat concerned about temp stability. I think I am at seventy two grains and acquire all around 2850ish fps
If you've got some heavier .224" bullets, you may perhaps discover a load that actually works OK Along with the 4831. The bullets I attempted that were about 70 grains would not stabilize in my rifle, which experienced the regular 14" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the most significant bullet that will stabilize, but it surely did that beautifully. It's a humorous-on the lookout bullet having a rounded nose profile, but it surely shoots great and kills effectively. Deer out to about a hundred and fifty yards al went down straight away with rib-cage h4831 vs h4831sc hits.
I have discovered the exact opposite to get legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally correct powder in my 300 Acquire Mag.
You may have for making a handful of extra posts to get cleared to complete PM's. As you reach that standing I would submit while in the categorized reloading segment to find out if any person is near you for a trade. Simply click to increase...
I've had similar experience h4831 vs h4831sc with H4350. For me, some ball powders will not shoot properly with nearly anything other than Fed215's. Some elements just Do not play well with other. Seems like you have picked three fantastic powders, I might anticipate at least one of these h4831sc to shoot.
This really is an Serious extruded propellant and features heightened insensitivity to cold and hot temperatures.
I'm sure the H4831SC presents a far better load density But I do think I've adequate area in my situation for the normal H4831.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Possess a minimal supply of Varget, plus a ton additional obtainable H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Just about completely, for the reason that that is definitely just what the rifles shoot the very best.